Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,850 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chris Baraniuk results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Optimism Bias , and Availability Heuristic , with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 6% saturation with 442 hits . Analysis detected 3,657 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,400 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 13% (5,807 of 6,628 authors). This Chris Baraniuk is better (less manipulative) than 87.60% of the peer group. Chris Baraniuk
Author details
Total words: 7,400
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
12% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 12.4% percentile 1.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles7.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.4% 1.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 0.5% 0.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.5% 5.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.0% 2.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.5% 0.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.5% 3.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.7% 2.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.6% 2.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.2% 1.2% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 5.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 6.0%, sitewide 3.3% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 3.2%, sitewide 0.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.5% Begging the Question: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst