Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 269 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chloe Hauxwell results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Fundamental Attribution Error , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 28.4% saturation with 229 hits . Analysis detected 1,752 faulty-reasoning hits from 807 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 12.1% and a BS Rank of 97% (237 of 6,260 authors). This Chloe Hauxwell is worse (more manipulative) than 96.20% of the peer group. Chloe Hauxwell
Author details
Total words: 807
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
96% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 96.2% percentile 12.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles807 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 28.4% 28.4% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Author 20.9% 20.9% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Author 13.6% 13.6% Straw Man Sitewide 0.9% Author 8.4% 8.4% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Author 9.2% 9.2% Genetic Fallacy Sitewide 1.4% Author 8.1% 8.1% Burden of Proof Sitewide 0.4% Author 6.4% 6.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 13.5% 13.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 9.7% 9.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 24.0% 24.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Author 28.4%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Author 27.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 24.0%, sitewide 19.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 20.9%, sitewide 2.7% Appeal to Emotion: Author 19.2%, sitewide 15.9% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 13.6%, sitewide 1.4% Confirmation Bias: Author 13.5%, sitewide 7.5% Hasty Generalization: Author 11.7%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Author 9.2%, sitewide 11.1% Overconfidence Bias: Author 9.7%, sitewide 4.6% Ad Hominem: Author 9.2%, sitewide 2.2% Straw Man: Author 8.4%, sitewide 0.9% Genetic Fallacy: Author 8.1%, sitewide 1.4% Burden of Proof: Author 6.4%, sitewide 0.4% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 3.7% Begging the Question: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.7% Sunk Cost Effect: Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst