Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Chelsey Zhu results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Recency Bias, Optimism Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 18.5% saturation with 164 hits. Analysis detected 962 faulty-reasoning hits from 888 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,628 authors). This Chelsey Zhu is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Chelsey Zhu
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Jacob Owens1%
1%Megan Fan Munce1%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
0%Chelsey Zhu (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 888
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles888 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 5.9%5.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 4.4%4.4%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Author 13.7%13.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 10.7%10.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 11.2%11.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 3.0%3.0%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Author 3.7%3.7%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 5.9%5.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 2.9%2.9%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 1.7%1.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 5.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 18.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.4%, sitewide 15.9%Recency Bias: Author 13.7%, sitewide 2.7%Optimism Bias: Author 11.2%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Author 10.1%, sitewide 11.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 10.7%, sitewide 3.3%Availability Heuristic: Author 9.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 3.0%, sitewide 8.1%Anchoring Bias: Author 5.9%, sitewide 4.0%Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 4.6%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 3.7%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.5%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 1.7%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos