Author summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,243 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Charlotte Dean results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Negativity Bias , and Framing Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 11.1% saturation with 861 hits . Analysis detected 6,897 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,750 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 57% (2,756 of 6,360 authors). This Charlotte Dean is worse (more manipulative) than 56.70% of the peer group. Charlotte Dean
Author details
Total words: 7,750
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
57% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 56.7% percentile 2.9% BS Score3 analyzed articles7.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 8.9% 8.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.0% 5.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 9.4% 9.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.1% 2.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.3% 1.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 11.1% 11.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.9% 1.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.4% 4.4% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.4% 0.4% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 4.4% 4.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 8.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 9.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.0%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 11.1%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.1%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 10.9%, sitewide 7.5% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.4%, sitewide 8.1% Halo Effect: Author 3.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 4.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Unattributed Quote: Author 4.4%, sitewide 1.1% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.6%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 2.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.8% Loss Aversion: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.0% Bandwagon: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst