Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video350 analyzed words
BS Summary: These CBC results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Appeal to Authority, and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 14.1% saturation with 197 hits. Analysis detected 1,317 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,400 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.1% and a BS Rank of 78% (1,612 of 7,061 authors). This CBC is worse (more manipulative) than 77.20% of the peer group.
CBC
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Cleveland Documenters1%
0%T. Christian Miller1%
0%Ken Armstrong1%
1%Franziska Wild1%
78%CBC (selected)5%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,400
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

77% percentile
025507510077.2% percentile
4.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 2.6%2.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 5.4%5.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 14.1%14.1%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 8.6%8.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.3%1.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.9%3.9%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 4.6%4.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 1.8%1.8%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Author 4.1%4.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 9.1%9.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 2.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 5.4%, sitewide 19.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 14.1%, sitewide 3.3%Appeal to Authority: Author 9.1%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 9.6%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.9%, sitewide 9.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 8.6%, sitewide 0.5%Halo Effect: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 5.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 3.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 4.6%Indoctrination: Author 4.6%, sitewide 0.0%Hindsight Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 1.4%Recency Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 2.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.5%Burden of Proof: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.4%Unattributed Quote: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos