Author summary
⁠59%3 analyzed articles/videos1,171 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cassie Carpenter results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Appeal to Emotion, and Halo Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 9.5% saturation with 497 hits. Analysis detected 4,785 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,224 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠57% (2,777 of 6,387 authors). This Cassie Carpenter is worse (more manipulative) than 56.50% of the peer group.
Cassie Carpenter
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠57%Cassie Carpenter (selected)3%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 5,224
Article count: 3
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

57% percentile
025507510056.5% percentile
2.9% BS Score3 analyzed articles5.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 5.2%5.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 6.1%6.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 6.7%6.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.9%1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 9.3%9.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 5.5%5.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.9%0.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 2.2%2.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 9.5%9.5%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 5.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 6.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 5.5%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Author 9.5%, sitewide 5.3%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 9.3%, sitewide 3.3%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 5.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 4.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 6.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 5.8%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 3.0%, sitewide 0.5%Recency Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.1%Bandwagon: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.9%Hindsight Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos