Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video573 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cassandra Flores results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Hasty Generalization, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.2% saturation with 262 hits. Analysis detected 2,186 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,719 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of 72% (1,864 of 6,628 authors). This Cassandra Flores is worse (more manipulative) than 71.90% of the peer group.
Cassandra Flores
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Jacob Owens1%
1%Megan Fan Munce1%
72%Cassandra Flores (selected)4%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,719
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

72% percentile
025507510071.9% percentile
3.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 4.9%4.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.5%1.5%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Author 6.4%6.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 9.6%9.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Author 6.8%6.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.8%1.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 6.1%6.1%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Author 5.9%5.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 15.2%15.2%Red HerringSitewide 0.7%Author 4.1%4.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 4.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 15.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 9.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 6.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 8.0%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Author 7.6%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Author 6.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 6.8%, sitewide 0.8%Halo Effect: Author 4.0%, sitewide 6.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 6.4%, sitewide 0.0%Optimism Bias: Author 5.5%, sitewide 6.0%False Dilemma: Author 5.9%, sitewide 1.5%Anecdotal: Author 3.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.6%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 4.4%, sitewide 2.7%Red Herring: Author 4.1%, sitewide 0.7%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Horn Effect: Author 3.3%, sitewide 1.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.1%Pessimism Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos