Author summary
2% 1 analyzed article/video 366 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cara Tabachnick results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Actor-Observer Bias , Framing Effect , and Self-Serving Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 3.1% saturation with 45 hits . Analysis detected 240 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,464 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 24% (5,039 of 6,628 authors). This Cara Tabachnick is better (less manipulative) than 76.00% of the peer group. Cara Tabachnick
Author details
Total words: 1,464
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
24% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 24.0% percentile 1.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.4% 2.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 3.1% 3.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.0% 1.0% Actor-Observer Bias Sitewide 0.6% Author 2.4% 2.4% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Author 1.0% 1.0% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 2.4% 2.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 1.5% 1.5% Representativeness Heuris… Sitewide 1.9% Author 1.6% 1.6% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 1.0% 1.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 19.2% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.0%, sitewide 9.1% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Actor-Observer Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.6% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.5%, sitewide 0.8% Unattributed Quote: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst