Author summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,233 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cameron Faulkner results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 13.2% saturation with 650 hits. Analysis detected 4,915 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,932 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠56% (2,725 of 6,170 authors). This Cameron Faulkner is worse (more manipulative) than 55.80% of the peer group.
Cameron Faulkner
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠56%Cameron Faulkner (selected)3%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 4,932
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

56% percentile
025507510055.8% percentile
2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 13.1%13.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 2.7%2.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 6.9%6.9%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 11.6%11.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 0.9%0.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 13.2%13.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Author 8.1%8.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.6%2.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 2.1%2.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.8%1.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 13.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 6.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.7%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 13.2%, sitewide 5.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 11.6%, sitewide 0.5%Appeal to Authority: Author 0.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 2.1%, sitewide 8.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 8.1%, sitewide 0.8%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Author 4.4%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Author 6.6%, sitewide 5.2%Optimism Bias: Author 6.4%, sitewide 6.0%Anchoring Bias: Author 5.9%, sitewide 4.0%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos