Author summary
82%1 analyzed article/video98 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Caleb Turner results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Anecdotal, and Halo Effect, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 18% saturation with 53 hits. Analysis detected 247 faulty-reasoning hits from 294 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 12% and a BS Rank of 97% (240 of 6,244 authors). This Caleb Turner is worse (more manipulative) than 96.20% of the peer group.
Caleb Turner
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
97%Caleb Turner (selected)13%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 294
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

96% percentile
025507510096.2% percentile
12.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles294 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Author 12.6%12.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 15.7%15.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 18.0%18.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 12.9%12.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 12.9%12.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 9.2%9.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Author 2.7%2.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 18.0%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 15.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 12.9%, sitewide 5.2%Halo Effect: Author 12.9%, sitewide 6.7%Hindsight Bias: Author 12.6%, sitewide 1.4%Optimism Bias: Author 9.2%, sitewide 6.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.7%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos