Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Caitlin Vogus results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Slippery Slope , and Hasty Generalization , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 18.8% saturation with 754 hits . Analysis detected 7,019 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,012 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,218 authors). This Caitlin Vogus is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Caitlin Vogus
Author details
Total words: 4,012
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.4% 6.4% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Author 18.5% 18.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 18.7% 18.7% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Author 12.8% 12.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 18.0% 18.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.2% 4.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.3% 0.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.9% 0.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.4% 0.4% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 7.0% 7.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 14.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 18.8%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 18.7%, sitewide 5.3% Slippery Slope: Author 18.5%, sitewide 1.7% Hasty Generalization: Author 18.0%, sitewide 8.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 12.8%, sitewide 2.0% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 7.5%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 6.8%, sitewide 7.5% Pessimism Bias: Author 7.0%, sitewide 1.9% In-Group Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 2.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Begging the Question: Author 4.0%, sitewide 1.7% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% False Dilemma: Author 3.4%, sitewide 1.5% Indoctrination: Author 3.3%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.2%, sitewide 3.3% Loss Aversion: Author 3.2%, sitewide 2.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst