Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video348 analyzed words
BS Summary: These C Mandler results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Anchoring Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Appeal to Authority, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 27.1% saturation with 368 hits. Analysis detected 2,143 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,360 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.9% and a BS Rank of 90% (652 of 6,362 authors). This C Mandler is worse (more manipulative) than 89.80% of the peer group.
C Mandler
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
90%C Mandler (selected)7%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,360
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

90% percentile
025507510089.8% percentile
6.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 23.2%23.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 2.1%2.1%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Author 8.0%8.0%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Author 6.3%6.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Author 6.8%6.8%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Author 8.4%8.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 13.8%13.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 2.2%2.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 2.6%2.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 1.2%1.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 27.1%, sitewide 26.9%Anchoring Bias: Author 23.2%, sitewide 4.0%Negativity Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Author 13.8%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Author 12.7%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 9.1%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Author 6.0%, sitewide 9.1%Recency Bias: Author 8.4%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Author 8.0%, sitewide 1.1%In-Group Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 6.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 6.8%, sitewide 0.8%Halo Effect: Author 2.2%, sitewide 6.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 6.3%, sitewide 3.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 6.3%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 5.7%, sitewide 1.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.2%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.9%, sitewide 4.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 3.1%Bandwagon: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Primacy Effect: Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.9%Hindsight Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.5%Blind-Spot Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos