Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 348 analyzed words
BS Summary: These C Mandler results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Anchoring Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Appeal to Authority , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 27.1% saturation with 368 hits . Analysis detected 2,143 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,360 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.9% and a BS Rank of 90% (652 of 6,362 authors). This C Mandler is worse (more manipulative) than 89.80% of the peer group. C Mandler
Author details
Total words: 1,360
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
90% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 89.8% percentile 6.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 23.2% 23.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 2.1% 2.1% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 8.0% 8.0% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Author 6.3% 6.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 6.8% 6.8% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Author 8.4% 8.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 13.8% 13.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.2% 2.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.6% 2.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.2% 1.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 27.1%, sitewide 26.9% Anchoring Bias: Author 23.2%, sitewide 4.0% Negativity Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 19.2% Hasty Generalization: Author 13.8%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Author 12.7%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 9.1%, sitewide 7.5% Availability Heuristic: Author 6.0%, sitewide 9.1% Recency Bias: Author 8.4%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 8.0%, sitewide 1.1% In-Group Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 6.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 6.8%, sitewide 0.8% Halo Effect: Author 2.2%, sitewide 6.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 6.3%, sitewide 3.3% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 6.3%, sitewide 0.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 5.7%, sitewide 1.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.2%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.9%, sitewide 4.6% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 3.1% Bandwagon: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Primacy Effect: Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.9% Hindsight Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.4% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.5% Blind-Spot Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst