Author summary
74% 1 analyzed article/video 2,081 analyzed words
BS Summary: These C. G. Beck results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 12.3% saturation with 769 hits . Analysis detected 5,820 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,243 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 48% (3,344 of 6,365 authors). This C. G. Beck is better (less manipulative) than 52.50% of the peer group. C. G. Beck
Author details
Total words: 6,243
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
48% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 47.5% percentile 2.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.5% 7.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.7% 8.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.1% 6.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.4% 2.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 12.3% 12.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.5% 2.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.6% 1.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.4% 1.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.2% 3.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.8% 1.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 8.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.1%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 12.3%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 5.9%, sitewide 6.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 6.5%, sitewide 3.3% Optimism Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 2.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 4.6% Pessimism Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 3.8%, sitewide 1.7% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.1%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst