Author summary
52% 5 analyzed articles/videos 1,257 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Brittany Vincent results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service , Appeal to Emotion , and Halo Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 19.2% saturation with 1,845 hits . Analysis detected 10,601 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,595 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 63% (2,352 of 6,215 authors). This Brittany Vincent is worse (more manipulative) than 62.20% of the peer group. Brittany Vincent
Author details
Total words: 9,595
Article count: 5
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
62% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 62.2% percentile 3.2% BS Score5 analyzed articles9.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.0% 5.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.0% 4.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 19.2% 19.2% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 12.0% 12.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 8.7% 8.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.2% 2.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.7% 4.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.7% 1.7% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 5.0% 5.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.9% 1.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Author 19.2%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.7%, sitewide 15.9% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 12.0%, sitewide 0.5% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.2%, sitewide 9.1% Halo Effect: Author 8.3%, sitewide 6.7% Hasty Generalization: Author 7.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 7.5% Overconfidence Bias: Author 7.0%, sitewide 4.6% Optimism Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 1.9%, sitewide 5.2% Indoctrination: Author 5.0%, sitewide 0.0% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.3% Loss Aversion: Author 3.1%, sitewide 2.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst