Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 3,584 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Britta Lokting results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Negativity Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10.5% saturation with 1,124 hits . Analysis detected 5,884 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,752 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 7% (5,744 of 6,138 authors). This Britta Lokting is better (less manipulative) than 93.60% of the peer group. Britta Lokting
Author details
Total words: 10,752
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
6% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 6.4% percentile 1.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles10.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 10.4% 10.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 3.4% 3.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.9% 2.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 0.6% 0.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.6% 2.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.5% 0.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.5% 1.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.8% 0.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.0% 3.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 10.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 0.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 6.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst