Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,022 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Brian T. Kaylor results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Negativity Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 27.6% saturation with 1,128 hits. Analysis detected 6,133 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,088 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.1% and a BS Rank of 76% (1,546 of 6,235 authors). This Brian T. Kaylor is worse (more manipulative) than 75.20% of the peer group.
Brian T. Kaylor
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
76%Brian T. Kaylor (selected)5%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 4,088
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

75% percentile
025507510075.2% percentile
4.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 27.6%27.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 5.1%5.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 7.3%7.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 10.8%10.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.3%1.3%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Author 7.4%7.4%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 6.1%6.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.8%0.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 5.8%5.8%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Author 6.4%6.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Author 27.6%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Author 5.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 10.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.3%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Author 12.8%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Author 5.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.3%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 7.8%, sitewide 7.5%Straw Man: Author 7.4%, sitewide 0.9%In-Group Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%False Dilemma: Author 6.4%, sitewide 1.5%Indoctrination: Author 6.1%, sitewide 0.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 5.8%, sitewide 3.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 5.5%, sitewide 2.0%Anecdotal: Author 0.4%, sitewide 5.2%Begging the Question: Author 4.8%, sitewide 1.7%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 4.6%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 4.0%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.0%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 3.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Slippery Slope: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos