Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,252 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Brian Stewart results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Confirmation Bias , and Hindsight Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 37.4% saturation with 1,873 hits . Analysis detected 7,695 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,008 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.5% and a BS Rank of 80% (1,332 of 6,628 authors). This Brian Stewart is worse (more manipulative) than 79.90% of the peer group. Brian Stewart
Author details
Total words: 5,008
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
80% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 79.9% percentile 4.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 37.4% 37.4% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.3% 3.3% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Author 11.4% 11.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.3% 3.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.9% 1.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.1% 1.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 13.1% 13.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 10.5% 10.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.4% 0.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.9% 3.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Author 37.4%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Author 3.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 20.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 10.5%, sitewide 15.9% Confirmation Bias: Author 13.1%, sitewide 7.5% Hindsight Bias: Author 11.4%, sitewide 1.4% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.9%, sitewide 8.1% Overconfidence Bias: Author 7.8%, sitewide 4.6% In-Group Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.5%, sitewide 3.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.4%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 3.9%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Author 3.4%, sitewide 2.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.1% Begging the Question: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.7%, sitewide 0.8% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.0% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst