Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video593 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Brian Gallagher results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Halo Effect, and Overconfidence Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 21.8% saturation with 388 hits. Analysis detected 2,786 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,779 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.3% and a BS Rank of 89% (774 of 6,628 authors). This Brian Gallagher is worse (more manipulative) than 88.30% of the peer group.
Brian Gallagher
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Jacob Owens1%
1%Megan Fan Munce1%
89%Brian Gallagher (selected)7%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,779
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

88% percentile
025507510088.3% percentile
6.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 2.2%2.2%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 18.5%18.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 21.8%21.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 2.4%2.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 7.4%7.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 12.1%12.1%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Author 11.1%11.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 13.6%13.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.0%3.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 2.0%2.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 2.2%, sitewide 26.9%Optimism Bias: Author 21.8%, sitewide 6.0%Negativity Bias: Author 7.4%, sitewide 19.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 18.5%, sitewide 0.5%Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.4%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Author 13.6%, sitewide 6.7%Overconfidence Bias: Author 12.1%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Author 11.1%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to Authority: Author 6.9%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 10.3%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 8.6%, sitewide 8.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 7.3%, sitewide 3.3%Biased Writer Voice: Author 7.1%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 6.9%Anecdotal: Author 0.9%, sitewide 5.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 5.0%, sitewide 0.8%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 4.0%Indoctrination: Author 3.9%, sitewide 0.0%False Dilemma: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.5%Loss Aversion: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.7%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos