Author summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos178 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Brent Bambury results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Hasty Generalization, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 39.9% saturation with 240 hits. Analysis detected 1,189 faulty-reasoning hits from 602 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 12.3% and a BS Rank of 97% (227 of 6,258 authors). This Brent Bambury is worse (more manipulative) than 96.40% of the peer group.
Brent Bambury
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
97%Brent Bambury (selected)13%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 602
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

96% percentile
025507510096.4% percentile
12.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles602 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 34.4%34.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 39.9%39.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 27.9%27.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 3.2%3.2%Red HerringSitewide 0.7%Author 10.8%10.8%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 8.3%8.3%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Author 9.8%9.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.2%3.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 4.2%4.2%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Author 6.3%6.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Author 39.9%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Author 34.4%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Author 27.9%, sitewide 8.1%Framing Effect: Author 25.6%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.2%, sitewide 15.9%Red Herring: Author 10.8%, sitewide 0.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 9.8%, sitewide 2.7%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.2%, sitewide 9.1%Indoctrination: Author 8.3%, sitewide 0.0%Confirmation Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 7.3%, sitewide 6.9%Anecdotal: Author 6.3%, sitewide 5.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 6.3%, sitewide 3.1%Begging the Question: Author 4.2%, sitewide 1.7%Bandwagon: Author 3.2%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 3.2%, sitewide 0.0%Negativity BiasSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos