Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Brad Olsen results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Appeal to Authority, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 21.4% saturation with 328 hits. Analysis detected 1,527 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,530 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,244 authors). This Brad Olsen is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Brad Olsen
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
0%Brad Olsen (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 1,530
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 3.2%3.2%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 21.4%21.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 1.0%1.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 6.3%6.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.3%1.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 6.7%6.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 5.6%5.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 2.8%2.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 9.6%9.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 6.7%6.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 3.2%, sitewide 26.9%Indoctrination: Author 21.4%, sitewide 0.0%Negativity Bias: Author 6.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 6.7%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 9.6%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Author 5.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 7.3%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.7%Overconfidence Bias: Author 6.7%, sitewide 4.6%Optimism Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.8%, sitewide 5.3%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 3.3%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 2.7%Begging the Question: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.7%Slippery Slope: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Sunk Cost Effect: Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.3%Pessimism Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.5%Burden of Proof: Author 1.3%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos