Author summary
98%1 analyzed article/video70 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Boston Herald staff results contain 14 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 79.5% saturation with 167 hits. Analysis detected 534 faulty-reasoning hits from 210 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 18.2% and a BS Rank of 99% (93 of 6,196 authors). This Boston Herald staff is worse (more manipulative) than 98.50% of the peer group.
Boston Herald staff
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
99%Boston Herald staff (selected)19%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 210
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

99% percentile
025507510098.5% percentile
18.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles210 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 79.5%79.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 35.2%35.2%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 18.1%18.1%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 15.2%15.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 18.1%18.1%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Author 11.4%11.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 12.9%12.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 20.5%20.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 9.1%9.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 15.2%15.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Biased Writer Voice: Author 79.5%, sitewide 5.3%Halo Effect: Author 35.2%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Emotion: Author 20.5%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Author 12.9%, sitewide 19.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 18.1%, sitewide 0.5%Hasty Generalization: Author 18.1%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Author 15.2%, sitewide 11.1%Indoctrination: Author 15.2%, sitewide 0.0%False Dilemma: Author 11.4%, sitewide 1.5%Availability Heuristic: Author 10.5%, sitewide 9.1%Overconfidence Bias: Author 9.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anecdotal: Author 1.4%, sitewide 5.2%Recency Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos