Author summary
⁠56%1 analyzed article/video1,028 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bob Johnson results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Appeal to Emotion, and Overconfidence Bias, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 27.7% saturation with 854 hits. Analysis detected 2,281 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,084 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠62% (2,510 of 6,463 authors). This Bob Johnson is worse (more manipulative) than 61.20% of the peer group.
Bob Johnson
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠62%Bob Johnson (selected)4%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,084
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

61% percentile
025507510061.2% percentile
3.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 27.7%27.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 4.0%4.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 1.2%1.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 4.9%4.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.4%2.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.0%1.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 3.0%3.0%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 0.4%0.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.6%1.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 2.7%2.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 27.7%, sitewide 0.5%Framing Effect: Author 4.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.9%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 5.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Author 3.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 1.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.9%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.0%False Dilemma: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.5%Genetic Fallacy: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.4%Appeal to Nature: Author 1.3%, sitewide 0.2%Primacy Effect: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.8%Attempt to Sell a Product or ServiceSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos