Author summary
47%1 analyzed article/video1,342 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bibek Bhandari results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Halo Effect, and Pessimism Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 10.3% saturation with 416 hits. Analysis detected 2,317 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,026 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 42% (3,887 of 6,628 authors). This Bibek Bhandari is better (less manipulative) than 58.60% of the peer group.
Bibek Bhandari
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Jacob Owens1%
1%Megan Fan Munce1%
42%Bibek Bhandari (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 4,026
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

41% percentile
025507510041.4% percentile
2.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 2.4%2.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 0.9%0.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 6.6%6.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 0.7%0.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.4%2.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.1%2.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 10.3%10.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 3.9%3.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.4%0.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 1.7%1.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 2.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 6.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 0.7%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Author 10.3%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 3.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Author 5.4%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.7%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.6%Pessimism Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 1.9%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 3.6%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.2%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Indoctrination: Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.0%Bandwagon: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.4%Composition/Division: Author 1.2%, sitewide 0.2%Unattributed Quote: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos