Author summary
64%1 analyzed article/video415 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Benjamin Leatherman results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, and Availability Heuristic, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 24.2% saturation with 301 hits. Analysis detected 628 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,245 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.6% and a BS Rank of 86% (897 of 6,244 authors). This Benjamin Leatherman is worse (more manipulative) than 85.60% of the peer group.
Benjamin Leatherman
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
86%Benjamin Leatherman (selected)6%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,245
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

86% percentile
025507510085.6% percentile
5.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 1.6%1.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 24.2%24.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.0%2.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 0.8%0.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 4.3%4.3%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 5.1%5.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 9.3%9.3%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Author 1.5%1.5%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Author 1.6%1.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 1.6%, sitewide 26.9%Halo Effect: Author 24.2%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.0%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Author 9.3%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Author 4.3%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 7.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 5.1%, sitewide 0.5%Recency Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos