Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 509 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ben Thorp results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Framing Effect , with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 40.3% saturation with 410 hits . Analysis detected 2,848 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,018 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 9.6% and a BS Rank of 95% (376 of 6,351 authors). This Ben Thorp is worse (more manipulative) than 94.10% of the peer group. Ben Thorp
Author details
Total words: 1,018
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
94% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 94.1% percentile 9.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 40.3% 40.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 35.5% 35.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 37.4% 37.4% Tu Quoque Sitewide 0.2% Author 8.9% 8.9% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 11.3% 11.3% Bandwagon Sitewide 2.2% Author 9.6% 9.6% Red Herring Sitewide 0.7% Author 7.5% 7.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Author 9.1% 9.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.4% 5.4% Primacy Effect Sitewide 0.9% Author 6.3% 6.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% In-Group Bias: Author 40.3%, sitewide 6.9% Negativity Bias: Author 37.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 35.5%, sitewide 15.9% Framing Effect: Author 25.1%, sitewide 26.9% Availability Heuristic: Author 12.0%, sitewide 9.1% Self-Serving Bias: Author 11.3%, sitewide 3.7% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.4%, sitewide 11.1% Bandwagon: Author 9.6%, sitewide 2.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 9.1%, sitewide 3.1% Tu Quoque: Author 8.9%, sitewide 0.2% Loss Aversion: Author 7.6%, sitewide 2.5% Confirmation Bias: Author 6.2%, sitewide 7.5% Red Herring: Author 7.5%, sitewide 0.7% Halo Effect: Author 5.2%, sitewide 6.7% Begging the Question: Author 6.7%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 6.4%, sitewide 1.5% Primacy Effect: Author 6.3%, sitewide 0.9% Optimism Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 6.0% Straw Man: Author 5.5%, sitewide 0.9% Ad Hominem: Author 5.4%, sitewide 2.2% Anecdotal: Author 2.6%, sitewide 5.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 4.5%, sitewide 2.7% Slippery Slope: Author 4.3%, sitewide 1.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst