Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,123 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Beccy Tanner results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause) , Availability Heuristic , and Anecdotal , with Unattributed Quote as the most egregious example at 5.8% saturation with 260 hits . Analysis detected 2,221 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,492 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 30% (4,626 of 6,585 authors). This Beccy Tanner is better (less manipulative) than 70.20% of the peer group. Beccy Tanner
Author details
Total words: 4,492
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
30% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 29.8% percentile 2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.7% 2.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 1.2% 1.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.5% 1.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.5% 0.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.0% 2.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.2% 1.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.7% 0.7% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 5.8% 5.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.7% 4.7% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 3.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.0% Unattributed Quote: Author 5.8%, sitewide 1.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.9%, sitewide 5.3% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.3%, sitewide 3.3% Anecdotal: Author 4.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 3.4%, sitewide 0.5% Recency Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.9% Primacy Effect: Author 0.4%, sitewide 0.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.1%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst