Author summary
100% 1 analyzed article/video 695 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Becca Lewis results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Optimism Bias , with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 91.3% saturation with 2,539 hits . Analysis detected 5,542 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,780 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 11.1% and a BS Rank of 96% (295 of 6,628 authors). This Becca Lewis is worse (more manipulative) than 95.60% of the peer group. Becca Lewis
Author details
Total words: 2,780
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
96% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 95.6% percentile 11.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 91.3% 91.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 19.5% 19.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.1% 2.1% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 16.9% 16.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.7% 2.7% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 9.9% 9.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.1% 1.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 5.5% 5.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 10.3% 10.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.5% 3.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% 80% 80% 100% 100% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 91.3%, sitewide 0.5% Framing Effect: Author 16.9%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 19.5%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.7%, sitewide 11.1% Optimism Bias: Author 10.3%, sitewide 6.0% Anchoring Bias: Author 9.9%, sitewide 4.0% Halo Effect: Author 8.2%, sitewide 6.7% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Anecdotal: Author 6.6%, sitewide 5.2% Loss Aversion: Author 5.8%, sitewide 2.5% Self-Serving Bias: Author 5.6%, sitewide 3.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 5.5%, sitewide 0.8% Status Quo Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 2.2% Primacy Effect: Author 0.5%, sitewide 0.9% Composition/Division: Author 0.7%, sitewide 0.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst