Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 810 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Barbara McQuade results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination , Negativity Bias , and Framing Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 26.2% saturation with 850 hits . Analysis detected 5,882 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,240 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.2% and a BS Rank of 84% (1,049 of 6,523 authors). This Barbara McQuade is worse (more manipulative) than 83.90% of the peer group. Barbara McQuade
Author details
Total words: 3,240
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
84% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 83.9% percentile 5.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 26.2% 26.2% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 17.4% 17.4% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 15.4% 15.4% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Author 12.4% 12.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.1% 2.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.1% 3.1% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Author 6.6% 6.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.9% 1.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.8% 0.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.4% 3.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 15.4%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 26.2%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Author 16.4%, sitewide 19.2% Indoctrination: Author 17.4%, sitewide 0.0% Appeal to Emotion: Author 12.9%, sitewide 15.9% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 12.4%, sitewide 2.0% Hasty Generalization: Author 11.6%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.1%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 3.8%, sitewide 6.7% False Dilemma: Author 6.6%, sitewide 1.5% Optimism Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 6.0% Status Quo Bias: Author 6.0%, sitewide 2.2% Anecdotal: Author 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 4.6% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 4.4%, sitewide 0.8% Anchoring Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 4.0% Pessimism Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 1.9% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.3% Begging the Question: Author 3.3%, sitewide 1.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst