Author summary
68% 1 analyzed article/video 954 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Austin Corona results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Quote-first Misdirection , and Appeal to Authority , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 9.1% saturation with 349 hits . Analysis detected 3,381 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,816 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 55% (2,954 of 6,457 authors). This Austin Corona is worse (more manipulative) than 54.30% of the peer group. Austin Corona
Author details
Total words: 3,816
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
54% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 54.3% percentile 2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 9.2% 9.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.9% 3.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 7.8% 7.8% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Author 6.7% 6.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.3% 1.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.7% 0.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 6.4% 6.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.2% 0.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.8% 3.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 5.0% 5.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 9.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 7.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 6.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 6.7%, sitewide 0.0% Optimism Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.9%, sitewide 5.3% False Dilemma: Author 5.3%, sitewide 1.5% Anecdotal: Author 2.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.3% Begging the Question: Author 3.1%, sitewide 1.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Indoctrination: Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.0% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.9% Loss Aversion: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst