Author summary
13% 2 analyzed articles/videos 983 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Astrid Code results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Appeal to Authority , and Indoctrination , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.9% saturation with 1,284 hits . Analysis detected 7,463 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,977 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 15% (5,677 of 6,629 authors). This Astrid Code is better (less manipulative) than 85.60% of the peer group. Astrid Code
Author details
Total words: 12,977
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
14% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 14.4% percentile 1.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles13K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.9% 1.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.0% 2.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 9.9% 9.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.0% 4.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.4% 2.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.7% 0.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.5% 1.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.2% 2.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.5% 1.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 9.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 4.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.3% Indoctrination: Author 3.1%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.9% Loss Aversion: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst