Author summary
0%3 analyzed articles/videos8,153 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ashley Hiruko results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Appeal to Authority, and Self-Serving Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.8% saturation with 4,585 hits. Analysis detected 14,223 faulty-reasoning hits from 30,938 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.1% and a BS Rank of 3% (6,236 of 6,382 authors). This Ashley Hiruko is better (less manipulative) than 97.70% of the peer group.
Ashley Hiruko
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
3%Ashley Hiruko (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 30,938
Article count: 3
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

2% percentile
02550751002.3% percentile
1.1% BS Score3 analyzed articles30.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 1.7%1.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 1.7%1.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.8%2.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.0%1.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.5%0.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.5%0.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.0%3.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 2.1%2.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 0.6%0.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.3%1.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 1.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 14.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 2.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 1.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate