Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 426 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ap Correspondent results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Authority , and Biased Writer Voice , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.6% saturation with 215 hits . Analysis detected 1,486 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,704 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of 69% (2,106 of 6,628 authors). This Ap Correspondent is worse (more manipulative) than 68.20% of the peer group. Ap Correspondent
Author details
Total words: 1,704
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
68% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 68.2% percentile 3.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 10.4% 10.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.9% 3.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 12.6% 12.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.6% 1.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.7% 2.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.9% 1.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.6% 1.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.5% 2.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.0% 2.0% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 3.8% 3.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 10.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 12.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 8.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Author 7.1%, sitewide 5.3% In-Group Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 6.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.8%, sitewide 0.8% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 3.8%, sitewide 0.5% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% Actor-Observer Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 0.6% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 3.6%, sitewide 2.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 3.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.0%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Middle Ground: Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.1% Burden of Proof: Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.4% False Dilemma: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.5% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst