Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These ANNA-CATHERINE BRIGIDA Associated Press results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Appeal to Emotion , and Biased Writer Voice , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 36% saturation with 694 hits . Analysis detected 2,443 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,926 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,172 authors). This ANNA-CATHERINE BRIGIDA Associated Press is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. ANNA-CATHERINE BRIGIDA Associated Press
Author details
Total words: 1,926
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 9.5% 9.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 36.0% 36.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.1% 3.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.2% 1.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 6.1% 6.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 11.1% 11.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 9.8% 9.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.4% 1.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 11.8% 11.8% Representativeness Heuris… Sitewide 1.9% Author 5.5% 5.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Negativity Bias: Author 36.0%, sitewide 19.2% Framing Effect: Author 9.5%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Author 11.1%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 11.8%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Author 6.1%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 9.8%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.1%, sitewide 9.1% In-Group Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 5.7%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 5.5%, sitewide 1.9% Anecdotal: Author 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.2%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.9% Ad Hominem: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.0% Begging the Question: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.1% Slippery Slope: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.5% Genetic Fallacy: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.4% Straw Man: Author 1.2%, sitewide 0.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.0%, sitewide 0.8% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst