Author summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Ann Coulter results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Politically Right Leaning Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 60.5% saturation with 2,175 hits. Analysis detected 9,755 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,596 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 6,382 authors). This Ann Coulter is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Ann Coulter
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
⁠0%Ann Coulter (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 3,596
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 60.5%60.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 5.9%5.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 27.9%27.9%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Author 18.9%18.9%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Author 11.5%11.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 29.8%29.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.1%2.1%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Author 8.5%8.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.6%0.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 11.3%11.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Biased Writer Voice: Author 60.5%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Author 29.8%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Author 27.9%, sitewide 8.1%Framing Effect: Author 5.9%, sitewide 26.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 18.9%, sitewide 1.4%Appeal to Emotion: Author 11.3%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Author 12.6%, sitewide 7.5%Straw Man: Author 11.5%, sitewide 0.9%Anecdotal: Author 11.3%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 5.0%, sitewide 9.1%Unattributed Quote: Author 8.5%, sitewide 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 8.4%, sitewide 3.3%Ad Hominem: Author 7.0%, sitewide 2.2%In-Group Bias: Author 6.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 5.8%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 5.1%, sitewide 2.7%Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 4.6%Begging the Question: Author 4.5%, sitewide 1.7%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.7%Indoctrination: Author 3.3%, sitewide 0.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos