Author summary
86%1 analyzed article/video319 analyzed words
BS Summary: These ANJUM NAVEED Associated Press results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Hasty Generalization, and Appeal to Authority, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 9.6% saturation with 92 hits. Analysis detected 717 faulty-reasoning hits from 957 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 62% (2,519 of 6,628 authors). This ANJUM NAVEED Associated Press is worse (more manipulative) than 62.00% of the peer group.
ANJUM NAVEED Associated Press
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Jacob Owens1%
1%Megan Fan Munce1%
62%ANJUM NAVEED Associated Press (selected)4%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 957
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

62% percentile
025507510062.0% percentile
3.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles957 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 8.5%8.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 4.5%4.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.6%2.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.0%1.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.3%0.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 6.9%6.9%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Author 4.3%4.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 4.6%4.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 9.6%9.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 2.5%2.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 8.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Author 6.9%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Author 9.6%, sitewide 6.7%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 7.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Author 5.1%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 2.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%Unattributed Quote: Author 4.3%, sitewide 1.1%Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.9%Composition/Division: Author 1.7%, sitewide 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect: Author 1.7%, sitewide 0.3%Indoctrination: Author 1.3%, sitewide 0.0%No True Scotsman: Author 1.3%, sitewide 0.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.0%, sitewide 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 0.5%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos