Author summary
⁠3%1 analyzed article/video3,053 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Angie Drobnic Holan results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Self-Serving Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 4.9% saturation with 594 hits. Analysis detected 3,165 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,212 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠1% (6,358 of 6,393 authors). This Angie Drobnic Holan is better (less manipulative) than 99.50% of the peer group.
Angie Drobnic Holan
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠1%Angie Drobnic Holan (selected)1%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 12,212
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

1% percentile
02550751000.5% percentile
0.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles12.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 0.8%0.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 0.6%0.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 0.1%0.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.8%1.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 0.1%0.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.6%1.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.4%1.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.9%0.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.7%0.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.2%0.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 0.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 0.2%, sitewide 5.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 4.9%, sitewide 0.8%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.5%Loss Aversion: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos