Author summary
â 0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Angela Watercutter results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Availability Heuristic , and Appeal to Authority , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 8.1% saturation with 297 hits . Analysis detected 2,443 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,648 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of â 0% (0 of 6,359 authors). This Angela Watercutter is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Angela Watercutter
Author details
Total words: 3,648
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 8.1% 8.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 3.3% 3.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.2% 4.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.4% 0.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.8% 4.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.7% 1.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.2% 1.2% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.1% 0.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 5.2% 5.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.9% 3.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 8.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.2%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 1.9% Recency Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.0% Slippery Slope: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst