Author summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,172 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Angela Giuffrida results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Unattributed Quote, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 15.5% saturation with 726 hits. Analysis detected 4,188 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,688 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠56% (2,977 of 6,628 authors). This Angela Giuffrida is worse (more manipulative) than 55.10% of the peer group.
Angela Giuffrida
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Jacob Owens1%
⁠1%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠56%Angela Giuffrida (selected)3%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 4,688
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

55% percentile
025507510055.1% percentile
2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 4.2%4.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 15.5%15.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.6%1.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 0.8%0.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 1.4%1.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 12.8%12.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.3%1.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.4%0.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 6.2%6.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.3%1.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 15.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 12.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 6.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 1.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 0.4%, sitewide 5.2%Unattributed Quote: Author 4.9%, sitewide 1.1%Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.4%, sitewide 4.6%Pessimism Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.8%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 2.6%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos