Author summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video928 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Andrew Holter results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Negativity Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Politically Left Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 12.6% saturation with 466 hits. Analysis detected 3,102 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,712 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠46% (3,437 of 6,357 authors). This Andrew Holter is better (less manipulative) than 54.10% of the peer group.
Andrew Holter
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠46%Andrew Holter (selected)3%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,712
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

46% percentile
025507510045.9% percentile
2.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 5.3%5.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 2.7%2.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 6.8%6.8%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Author 12.6%12.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.0%1.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 0.7%0.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 11.9%11.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.2%1.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.7%0.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.7%1.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 5.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 6.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.7%, sitewide 15.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 12.6%, sitewide 2.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 11.9%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 0.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 3.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 1.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.7%, sitewide 3.3%Anecdotal: Author 5.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.4%, sitewide 0.8%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.1%Pessimism Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Hindsight Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.4%False Dilemma: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos