Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Andrew Fox results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Pessimism Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 19.8% saturation with 618 hits . Analysis detected 3,230 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,120 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,228 authors). This Andrew Fox is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Andrew Fox
Author details
Total words: 3,120
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.9% 1.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.3% 2.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.1% 1.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 12.6% 12.6% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 9.2% 9.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.6% 1.6% Burden of Proof Sitewide 0.4% Author 6.0% 6.0% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 5.2% 5.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.1% 1.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 5.9% 5.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 19.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.3%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 12.6%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.1%, sitewide 11.1% Pessimism Bias: Author 9.2%, sitewide 1.9% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 8.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.0% Burden of Proof: Author 6.0%, sitewide 0.4% Overconfidence Bias: Author 5.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anecdotal: Author 2.2%, sitewide 5.2% Indoctrination: Author 5.2%, sitewide 0.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.8% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Hindsight Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.4% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst