Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 3,851 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Andrew Adams results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal , Appeal to Emotion , and Appeal to Authority , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 4.7% saturation with 719 hits . Analysis detected 7,186 faulty-reasoning hits from 15,404 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.1% and a BS Rank of 3% (6,477 of 6,628 authors). This Andrew Adams is better (less manipulative) than 97.70% of the peer group. Andrew Adams
Author details
Total words: 15,404
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
2% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 2.3% percentile 1.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles15.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.2% 3.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.7% 4.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.4% 3.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.2% 3.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.5% 1.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.7% 0.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.6% 2.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.2% 2.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.3% 1.3% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 2.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 3.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.6%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst