Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 148 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Andrea Shalal results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Negativity Bias , and Framing Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 76% saturation with 450 hits . Analysis detected 3,058 faulty-reasoning hits from 592 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 28.7% and a BS Rank of 100% (25 of 6,628 authors). This Andrea Shalal is worse (more manipulative) than 99.60% of the peer group. Andrea Shalal
Author details
Total words: 592
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
100% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 99.6% percentile 28.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles592 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–100%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 76.0% 76.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 75.2% 75.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 70.8% 70.8% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Author 43.9% 43.9% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 41.9% 41.9% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 61.0% 61.0% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Author 29.1% 29.1% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 24.0% 24.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 17.9% 17.9% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 8.1% 8.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% 80% 80% 100% 100% Biased Writer Voice: Author 76.0%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Author 75.2%, sitewide 8.1% Negativity Bias: Author 70.8%, sitewide 19.2% Framing Effect: Author 61.0%, sitewide 26.9% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 43.9%, sitewide 2.0% Pessimism Bias: Author 41.9%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 29.1%, sitewide 1.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 24.0%, sitewide 3.3% Confirmation Bias: Author 17.9%, sitewide 7.5% Availability Heuristic: Author 16.2%, sitewide 9.1% Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.1%, sitewide 15.9% Recency Bias: Author 10.0%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 8.1%, sitewide 0.8% False Dilemma: Author 8.1%, sitewide 1.5% Indoctrination: Author 8.1%, sitewide 0.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 6.1%, sitewide 3.1% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 6.1%, sitewide 1.9% Status Quo Bias: Author 6.1%, sitewide 2.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst