Author summary
â 0% 1 analyzed article/video 975 analyzed words
BS Summary: These ANDREA ROSA results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Biased Writer Voice , and Hasty Generalization , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 5.5% saturation with 216 hits . Analysis detected 2,277 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,900 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of â 42% (3,747 of 6,448 authors). This ANDREA ROSA is better (less manipulative) than 58.10% of the peer group. ANDREA ROSA
Author details
Total words: 3,900
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
42% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 41.9% percentile 2.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.3% 2.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 3.3% 3.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.5% 5.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.3% 0.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.4% 5.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.2% 3.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.7% 4.7% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.3% 1.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.9% 0.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 5.1% 5.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 4.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.0%, sitewide 3.3% Hindsight Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.4% Bandwagon: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.0% Unattributed Quote: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.8% Primacy Effect: Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.9% Appeal to Nature: Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.2% Burden of Proof: Author 0.7%, sitewide 0.4% Special Pleading: Author 0.4%, sitewide 0.3% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst