Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video433 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Amy Gorel results contain 14 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Framing Effect, and Status Quo Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 10.2% saturation with 177 hits. Analysis detected 795 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,732 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of 65% (2,339 of 6,628 authors). This Amy Gorel is worse (more manipulative) than 64.70% of the peer group.
Amy Gorel
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Jacob Owens1%
1%Megan Fan Munce1%
65%Amy Gorel (selected)4%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,732
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

65% percentile
025507510064.7% percentile
3.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 4.6%4.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 3.4%3.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 3.5%3.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.0%1.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 10.2%10.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.3%1.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.1%1.1%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Author 8.2%8.2%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 0.2%0.2%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Author 3.4%3.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 4.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 10.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 3.5%, sitewide 11.1%Self-Serving Bias: Author 8.2%, sitewide 3.7%In-Group Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.0%Status Quo Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 2.2%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 3.4%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.1%Hindsight Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.2%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos