Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,134 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Amrit Singh results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Authority , and Confirmation Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 32.8% saturation with 1,117 hits . Analysis detected 5,601 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,402 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.3% and a BS Rank of 85% (1,006 of 6,628 authors). This Amrit Singh is worse (more manipulative) than 84.80% of the peer group. Amrit Singh
Author details
Total words: 3,402
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
85% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 84.8% percentile 5.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 32.8% 32.8% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.1% 6.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 31.4% 31.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.7% 6.7% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 9.5% 9.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.2% 1.2% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 8.1% 8.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.4% 4.4% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 3.9% 3.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.4% 1.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Author 32.8%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Author 31.4%, sitewide 19.2% Framing Effect: Author 6.1%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 11.8%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 9.9%, sitewide 7.5% Unattributed Quote: Author 9.5%, sitewide 1.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.1%, sitewide 8.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 8.1%, sitewide 3.3% Optimism Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 4.6% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 4.0%, sitewide 0.8% Indoctrination: Author 3.9%, sitewide 0.0% Recency Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 2.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Begging the Question: Author 3.1%, sitewide 1.7% Slippery Slope: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 2.0% Loss Aversion: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst