Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,207 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Amir Handjani results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause) , Framing Effect , and Hindsight Bias , with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 8.7% saturation with 421 hits . Analysis detected 3,872 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,828 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 37% (4,204 of 6,628 authors). This Amir Handjani is better (less manipulative) than 63.40% of the peer group. Amir Handjani
Author details
Total words: 4,828
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
37% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 36.6% percentile 2.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.7% 5.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 2.8% 2.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 0.9% 0.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.3% 1.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.7% 2.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.4% 0.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.5% 0.5% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 8.0% 8.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.9% 0.9% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Author 5.7% 5.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.7%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 8.7%, sitewide 7.5% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.9%, sitewide 8.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 8.0%, sitewide 3.3% In-Group Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 5.2%, sitewide 6.0% Hindsight Bias: Author 5.7%, sitewide 1.4% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 5.1%, sitewide 4.6% False Dilemma: Author 4.3%, sitewide 1.5% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Indoctrination: Author 2.2%, sitewide 0.0% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.1% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst