Author summary
93% 1 analyzed article/video 1,312 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Amanuel Asfaw results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Anecdotal , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 22% saturation with 866 hits . Analysis detected 5,241 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,936 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4% and a BS Rank of 76% (1,627 of 6,628 authors). This Amanuel Asfaw is worse (more manipulative) than 75.50% of the peer group. Amanuel Asfaw
Author details
Total words: 3,936
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
76% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 75.5% percentile 4.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 22.0% 22.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.9% 6.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.5% 3.5% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 19.9% 19.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.1% 0.1% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 6.4% 6.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 10.0% 10.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.9% 3.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 9.2% 9.2% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Author 4.6% 4.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 19.9%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 22.0%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Author 6.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 10.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.5%, sitewide 11.1% Anecdotal: Author 9.2%, sitewide 5.2% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 8.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.1%, sitewide 6.7% Indoctrination: Author 6.4%, sitewide 0.0% Optimism Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 4.6% False Dilemma: Author 4.6%, sitewide 1.5% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.1% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.9% Recency Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.7%, sitewide 0.8% Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.0% Slippery Slope: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst