Author summary
62% 1 analyzed article/video 258 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Amanda Yeo results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Framing Effect , and False Dilemma , with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 14.3% saturation with 111 hits . Analysis detected 765 faulty-reasoning hits from 774 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.2% and a BS Rank of 88% (796 of 6,628 authors). This Amanda Yeo is worse (more manipulative) than 88.00% of the peer group. Amanda Yeo
Author details
Total words: 774
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
88% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 88.0% percentile 6.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles774 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 10.2% 10.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.3% 2.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 7.5% 7.5% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 14.3% 14.3% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Author 9.7% 9.7% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 8.4% 8.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.8% 4.8% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 3.8% 3.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.3% 2.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 8.3% 8.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 10.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 7.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.3%, sitewide 15.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 14.3%, sitewide 3.3% Hasty Generalization: Author 10.5%, sitewide 8.1% False Dilemma: Author 9.7%, sitewide 1.5% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.8%, sitewide 9.1% Pessimism Bias: Author 8.4%, sitewide 1.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 8.3%, sitewide 5.3% Confirmation Bias: Author 7.1%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 4.6% Indoctrination: Author 3.8%, sitewide 0.0% Begging the Question: Author 3.2%, sitewide 1.7% Blind-Spot Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst