Author summary
28% 1 analyzed article/video 1,066 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Amanda Smith results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service , Halo Effect , and Anecdotal , with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 9.7% saturation with 414 hits . Analysis detected 2,748 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,264 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 31% (4,485 of 6,485 authors). This Amanda Smith is better (less manipulative) than 69.20% of the peer group. Amanda Smith
Author details
Total words: 4,264
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
31% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 30.8% percentile 2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.4% 2.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 1.7% 1.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.2% 3.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.9% 0.9% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 9.7% 9.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.3% 1.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.3% 0.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.6% 2.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.2% 3.2% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 4.8% 4.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.9%, sitewide 11.1% Indoctrination: Author 9.7%, sitewide 0.0% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 4.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 4.3%, sitewide 5.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 4.8%, sitewide 0.5% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 4.1%, sitewide 0.8% Self-Serving Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 3.7% Loss Aversion: Author 3.8%, sitewide 2.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.3% False Dilemma: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst