Author summary
41% 1 analyzed article/video 699 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Amanda Caswell results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Slippery Slope , and Optimism Bias , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 12.7% saturation with 267 hits . Analysis detected 1,622 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,097 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 57% (2,773 of 6,382 authors). This Amanda Caswell is worse (more manipulative) than 56.60% of the peer group. Amanda Caswell
Author details
Total words: 2,097
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
57% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 56.6% percentile 2.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–25%
0.0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.8% 4.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.6% 8.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.6% 1.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.1% 1.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.2% 4.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 12.7% 12.7% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 4.6% 4.6% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Author 5.3% 5.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 1.0% 1.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.8% 1.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 5% 5% 10% 10% 15% 15% 20% 20% 25% 25% Negativity Bias: Author 8.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.8%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 12.7%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.2%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.5%, sitewide 5.3% Slippery Slope: Author 5.3%, sitewide 1.7% Anecdotal: Author 4.2%, sitewide 5.2% Indoctrination: Author 4.6%, sitewide 0.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 4.6% Pessimism Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 1.9% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.0%, sitewide 3.3% False Dilemma: Author 3.1%, sitewide 1.5% Recency Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.7% Composition/Division: Author 1.5%, sitewide 0.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.5%, sitewide 0.0% Burden of Proof: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst